This year, every school in our board will be participating
in an inquiry to explore STEAM education. Two weeks ago we launched this initiative with a kick-off event for secondary teachers at the Education
Centre.
STEAM is part of my job title; it is an acronym for Science,
Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math. We anticipated some uncertainty about
what this would look like in schools, particularly in secondary schools where
we naturally separate the subjects into different rooms, hallways, or wings of
our school buildings. I am proud that this acronym is part of my title, though I might add that I've had my fill of STEAM puns and jokes for the time being. (These include, but are not limited to 'STEAM rooms,' 'getting STEAMy,' references to trains and conductor's hats, and the use of phrases like 'full STEAM ahead!'...I'm sure you get the idea.)
I have had many conversations with teachers in the two weeks since the secondary STEAM launch. There are lots of great ideas brewing as school
teams decide what direction their projects will take. Interestingly, many of my
conversations with teachers have touched on the acronym itself. Months ago,
when the idea to focus on STEAM was ‘born’ at the SCDSB, we were aware that the
acronym might be met with some raised eyebrows. It turns out we were right!
Acronym
Conversations, Type 1: “Where’s my
letter?”
- Can I ‘do STEAM’ if I am a History teacher?
- I don’t teach Science and I’m not comfortable with Math. I don’t see myself in this.
- I teach a Foods class and would like to incorporate some Science and Geography. Does this count?
It is obvious from these conversations that the STEAM
acronym understates the scope of this work. Focusing on the letters puts us at
rick of limiting our thinking. It leaves out the ‘H’ from History, the ‘C’ from
Civics, and the ‘G’ from Geography. Social Studies, Health and Physical
Education, Business, Modern Languages, are also missing (I'm sure you'll let me know if I have missed 'your' letter). Imagine the
possibilities if we bring in other subjects: SHAM, SASS, GAME, CHAT, CHEATS, BEACH, CHASM, GAMES…
I can picture students creating wearable electronics in
fashion class, advocating for community needs through kinetic art projects
created using found materials, or partnering with schools across the world to
learn about the impact of water pollution on health and well-being. I want everyone to hear, loud and clear, that this project can include your letter, even if it's not one of the letters in the slide deck.
Acronym
Conversations, Type 2: “There are too
many letters!”
- I already do STEM really well. Do I need Art?
- I can imagine bringing some Art into my Math class, but Science too?!?
- I’m a Tech teacher. I think I do these things already, just not all at once.
It is clear to me that the other problem with the acronym is
that it may imply that the removal of a letter diminishes the value
of subject integration, suggesting that STEM, MAST, SEAM, TEAS, SEM, MST, TEM,
ST, SM, MT, ET, ES, and EM, when done well, are less valuable than STEAM.
Unless subject-specific departments and course codes
disappear from secondary school it will be difficult for most teachers to
engage in '5-letter STEAM' in a rich way. In our team’s view, every time we purposefully
integrate skills and knowledge from more than one discipline into our teaching,
we are bringing STEAM education to our students. Teachers who are helping
students make these transdisciplinary connections are doing a great job being
STEAMy! In this case, the upcoming inquiries may be an opportunity for these
teachers to share their good practice within or among schools, or may allow
them to meet with like-minded teachers to explore a particular area of interest
such as assessment.
So what?
In giving this initiative a name we certainly did not intend
to strictly define – or limit – its boundaries. I hope that teachers will be
able to look beyond the acronym and see two things: that STEAM already lives in their
schools, and that the possibilities for this project are endless.
The word STEAM has become a word that encompasses everything
we love about student-driven, inquiry-based learning that integrates a variety
of skills and concepts from across our curriculum. As one colleague correctly
stated, we could just call it ‘SCHOOL!’
Well said!
ReplyDeleteWe launched www.AccessSTEM.com about 2 years ago, and often we have to answer why we still call it STEM? We have tried to define it more as a STEM approach to learning -using performance and literacy tasks to draw connections to real-world problem solving. We have had our own share of debates internally whether we should be modifying the name, but the word of the moment could change, and running to catch up seems silly.
Project-based and inquiry-based learning sometimes seems to be this paradigm shift that some educators struggle with implementing. I had this discussion just last week at a board level, and it was funny, because the final line from my colleggue was "just call it school"...great minds think alike!
SCHOOL it is! Great reflection Amy.
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks for supporting the A in all you do ;)